|
The
Depression of
Economic Optimism
May
22, 2002
Konrad Switters
The New York Times recently
reported in an article titled Despite a Year of Upheavals, Economic Optimism
Is High, that "In a survey by the University of Michigan, half of
those polled said that they believe that the next five years will bring continuous
good times. [1]"
This in spite of reports of a virtual certainty of further terrorist attacks
in the United States within that same time period. In a spasm of paranoia
FBI Director, Robert Mueller predicted there would be, "'another terrorist
attack' in the United States," adding that, 'We will not be able to stop
it.' The FBI director also called it 'inevitable' that the United States would
one day see pedestrian suicide bombers. [2]"
This blind economic optimism
can only be a result of wishful thinking. To ignore so consciously the global
political conflict in which the United States has embroiled itself, to have
forgotten so thoroughly the pain of September 11 [even under the guise of
getting back to normal so that the terrorist don't "win"], and to
have total amnesia regarding the simplicity by which a biological agent could
be distributed through a system as seemingly benign as the United States Postal
Service, reveals a condition of staggering denial on the part of the American
public. To think that the current "consumer confidence" is a sign
of strength and a virtuosity, and not a sign of a mass cultural psychosis,
is a symptom of the blind and valueless utopian capitalist culture that currently
masquerades as "democracy" in America.
When Americans realize
that no amount of cash infusion into the military budget will keep them safe
from random acts of terrorism, perhaps they will demand that their tax dollars
also be diverted into more constructive forms of international diplomacy.
Terrorism is a group's [Al Qaeda's] response to perceived grievances [capricious,
licentious, or otherwise] against an entity [the United States] which they
have no means or desire to confront on its own terms. In resorting to terrorism,
this group has concluded that it is not feasible, nor are they interested
in negotiating along traditional avenues.
Therefore any military
response on behalf of the United States will be nothing more than a bandaid
on a much larger problem; since it is precisely this heavy-handed democracy-subversive
hegemony that the terrorist and their sympathizers among the Arab world are
reacting to [and quite effectively one might add - the government's telling
American citizens about the inevitability of another attack is confirmation
of terrorism's success; and directly inapposite to their previous suggestion
to go back to "normal" life]. But this is not to say that the military
response is the wrong response, just that the military response cannot be
the only reply; enough money might eventually stop terrorism, but only if
the military conducts a genocide of terrorist culture [deemed to be predominantly
Arab at the present time]. The military response must only be used as an initial
"defense," to shore up to the emaciated foundations of a culture
which has been fed so long on a diet of economic self-aggrandizement. After
the necessary military response America must construct and develop a much
broader political and social offensive.
It is here that the American
public's real optimism must be engaged. In the coming months and years, as
new acts of terrorism lure the United States deeper into a military conflict
that will begin to resemble an act of genocide on Arab culture, American lives
will depend on their developing a new means of understanding and perceiving
themselves in the broader context of the planet Earth. True peace will never
be possible if Americans can not find a way to see beyond the stock quotes
in the Wall Street Journal, to truly engage and empathize with the world of
people that is affected immeasurably through their country's baneful manipulation
of the economic web that is referred to as the global economy.
Works Cited:
[1] http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/21/business/21ECON.html
[2] http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/05/20/gen.war.on.terror/index.html
|